The Final Report of the Tribunal of Inquiry into Certain Planning Matters and Payments
The full text of the final report of the Mahon Tribunal is available for download from the link below.
http://www.planningtribunal.ie/images/finalReport.pdf
Thursday, 29 March 2012
Wednesday, 28 March 2012
The Irish Referendum on the EU Fiscal Compact Treaty - Vote 'NO'
Irish Referendum on the
EU Fiscal Compact Treaty
May 31st
2012
The
Irish Government has announced that the referendum to amend the
Constitution to allow the State to ratify the EU Fiscal Compact
Treaty (formally,
the Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance in the Economic
and Monetary Union; also called the Fiscal Stability Treaty)
will be held on May 31st.
The
battle-lines were drawn as soon as the Government received the AG's
advice of the necessity to hold a referendum. With the announcement
of the date the campaign will begin in earnest. So, what's it all
about?
In
it's simplest terms this Treaty provides a legislative basis to give
the EU overarching control of the constituent economies of the
eurozone area.
Oh, right. Sorry.
That's EU-bureaucratic speak, for it's gives the EU complete financial control over the economies, and by extension, the budgetary policy of the eurozone member states.
Oh, right. Sorry.
That's EU-bureaucratic speak, for it's gives the EU complete financial control over the economies, and by extension, the budgetary policy of the eurozone member states.
Let's do that again;
it's gives the EU complete
financial control over the economies, and by extension, the budgetary policy
of the eurozone member states
This
will be achieved by the imposition of a national requirement to have
national budgets that are in balance or in surplus. The European
Court of Justice would fine a country up to 0.1% of GDP if this has
not been done this a year after ratification. It will
create
a fiscal union across the eurozone with strict and enforceable fiscal
rules and automatic penalties
where these rules are not kept. The EU, or more specifically, Germany
and France will be calling the shots on the fiscal policies of the EU
member states. Countries dancing to this tune will then, and only
then, be allowed access funding from the ESM (European Stability
Mechanism), a permanent rescue fund to be established in tandem with
the ratification of this Treaty. In other words, do with the Germans
say and they will (continue to) give you bailout money. Otherwise,
it's even more hardship and suffering as your hung out to dry.
In
short – it's a classic hobson's choice (with a twist – see
below). Austerity or more Austerity?
So,
in the specific case of the Irish Republic, why do I advocate a 'NO'
vote? The reasons are many and complex. It would be disingenuous of
me to reel of the bog standard pisspoor arguments of the anti-Europe faction in Ireland. There is a always a vote 'NO' brigade on the far
left of the political spectrum who I really believe only oppose
referenda because the government of the day supports and proposes the
amendment. The old chestnuts like neutrality and abortion cannot be trotted out either. This is purely financial.
Here are the main reasons I advocate a 'NO' vote;
Here are the main reasons I advocate a 'NO' vote;
- On the grounds that this is a treaty that will entrench, indeed, embed within an EU legislative framework the austerity measures being endured by Irish people. VOTE 'NO'
- On the grounds that the process of stripping Ireland of her economic sovereignty, begun by the EU/ECB/IMF in November 2010 would be completed. Our economic independence would be lost to Brussels, or more accurately, Germany. VOTE 'NO'
- On the basis of (1) and (2) above, it is clear that this is an austerity treaty. VOTE 'NO'
- Ireland is being forced by the pre-existing bailout deal to pay bondholder debts for banks the state itself now owns. Despite election pledges to the contrary. VOTE 'NO'
- Any remote possibility Ireland has of renegotiating the terms of the 2010 bailout deal would be gone for good. Actually, they would be reinforced. We would be unable to restructure our own debts. VOTE 'NO'
- On the basis of (4) and (5) above, Ireland would be locked into a depressive economic cycle that could take generations to break out of. VOTE 'NO'
- Because our inequitable flat rate household charge is EU/ECB/IMF imposed. VOTE 'NO'
- Because of all the other sneaky charges Edna & Co have in store (septic tanks, water rates etc.) VOTE 'NO'
- Because of everything we have learned from the Mahon Tribunal report about our corrupt and rotten political system and politicians. From all parties. Because I am sick of them robbing us blind and laughing at us. VOTE 'NO'
Now here's the real rub, as far as this Treaty and the direction Europe is taking. I describe it as the EU democratic deficit. Because in order to ensure the big players get their way in Europe, through this Treaty, in response to the sovereign debt crisis and to ensure that no one country (especially a small irrelevant like Ireland) can no longer hold up the European project, a la Lisbon, they have rewritten the rules so that our vote, our referenda don't matter anymore.
Let me explain;
Let me explain;
The
powers that be in the EU (Germany and France that is) have been
stumbling around in the dark in response to the EU sovereign debt
crisis. Their answer is wrapped up in this Fiscal Compact treaty. And
it is EU Fiscal harmonisation. Controlled by Germany of course. This
was what they initially wanted to achieve with the proposed EU
Constitution. That was dropped like a piece of hot coal when Spain
rejected and it looked likely the French people
would do the same. The lack of centralised economic control was what
undermined the EURO right from the outset. Sure, the Germans had
nominal control at that point and as long as the economic outlook
(artificially fuelled during the 'boom' years and underpinned by a
strong German economy) stayed good things were OK – but the
sovereign debt crisis exploded that myth. Having invested so much in
the EURO and the European project the EU couldn't afford to let the
EURO collapse.
Now,
it was OK, to force (frighten, coerce, threaten, take your pick)
Ireland into second referendums on Nice & Lisbon. But that would
not be done in Spain or France (EU Constitution). And what if some
pesky country like Ireland voted down their precious Fiscal Compact?
(In any event only Ireland of 27 eurozone members is bound to hold a
referendum, the UK has not endorsed the Treaty and will remain
outside) Or if Greece fell apart before it came into effect? (Quick,
throw some bailout money their way).
The
answer was simple. With the stroke of a pen 60 years of the European
project was jettisoned. Only 12 countries need ratify the treaty by
January 1st
2013 for it to come into effect. (That's Germany, France, Spain,
Holland, Belgium, Luxembourg, Italy, Denmark, Sweden, Portugal, Malta
& Finland maybe??) The rest can sink or swim. Once the treaty is
in effect, you will be cut off quick if you don't play ball (that is
surrender to fiscal federalism). Being inside is no guarantee of not
being cut adrift or being forced out of the EURO. This
is the new EU sponsored democratic
deficit.
It smacks of arrogance and smugness and a complete disregard for a
small nation like ours. So, now I am wondering - is Ireland better off without the EU?
A
'NO' vote from Ireland won't stop this. The EU gerrymandering has
ensured this. But let them have it. Ireland, along with our largest
trading partner, the UK, (a good enough reason on its own) is better of out of
this. Then we would have the opportunity (if not the politicians, but
hey, lets do one thing at a time) to map our own way forward out of
this economic mire. Iceland and Argentina are good reference points
for us here.
There
is an alternative. Vote
'NO'.
Tuesday, 20 March 2012
GOP Primaries - and the race drags on
Well the primaries of Tuesday 13th went pretty much according to expectation. There was no breakthrough for Gingrich. I wonder if the media is right to call it as a he 'breakthrough' he needed. I think his campaign is dead. If he withdraws (and he is under a lot of pressure to do so) to allow Santorum have his straight right v left fight with Romney who would benefit most? The pressure is coming from the Santorum people. But would they gain anything other than a guaranteed runner-up spot?
Even with his victories last week the gap between Santorum and Romney (253-521) widened. Romney is almost halfway there. I expect them to swap victories in Illinois (Mar 20th, Romney) & Louisiana (Mar 24th). A continuation of that trend will continue - Romney winning among the moderate elements and Santorum the more right wing South.
This is the problem for the GOP. Romney may get over the line without making any inroads in the States he will have to carry in November. He scraped by in Ohio. This doesn't augur well. So, what happens in Texas (April 29th) could be decisive. Could it end up a brokered GOP convention (foisted on Romney) where Santorum is pushed onto the ticket for Vice-President? Or is it because of that very possibility that Gingrich is still gasping for air?
Why however, have the Republicans let it come to this anyway? Are they hell bent on losing in November?
Monday, 12 March 2012
U.S. Presidential Election 2012
Well, it's Presidential Election year in the U.S. - a fact that will have escaped the attention of very few no matter how apolitical they may be.
As something of a political junkie this is manna for the likes of me of course. But how well do most people, Americans included, understand the system that elects their President? Well without going through the whole process, skip the primaries, and try to get an understanding of the Electoral College. Check out this video;
I will be keeping tabs on how the race for the White House is going from primaries to conventions right through to the big day itself - Tuesday, November 6th - starting here.
The U.S. Presidential Election of 2012, the 57th election for the Office of President is scheduled for Tuesday, Novemeber 6th, 2012. The current Officeholder, Barack Obama, is the 44th U.S. President. He will be the Democrat Party candidate. Who he will face in the general election is still undecided. The Republican Party (GOP) primary selection process rumbles on. As of today, March 12th, however it looks undoubtedly like a straight fight between Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum.
1,144 Delegates are required to secure the nomination at the GOP convention. Romney is on 454 to Santorum's 217. Newt Gingrich, former House Speaker, with 107 delegates is coming under pressure from the Santorum people to exit the race. Certainly, he needs big wins in the Southern State primaries on Tuesday March 14th. But would that be enough? Should he step aside to give the more Right wing Santorum a fair crack at Romney?
For one of the best GOP Delegate Trackers around visit http://projects.wsj.com/campaign2012/delegates
One thing is for sure - the way this Republican primary has panned out is putting pressure on GOP public and private resources to fight the general election - in two key ways.
1. The obvious one is money - this is a very expensive primary campaign. An example - Romney last week began making his first public appeals for money even though his personal wealth is estimated at $250 million.
2. More significantly, will this campaign cause irreversible fractures along the left/right GOP fault-lines? And is that maybe what this year is really about for the GOP? Are they giving up on the White House in order to get their own house in order first?
So a second "Super Tuesday" beckons......
More to follow....
1,144 Delegates are required to secure the nomination at the GOP convention. Romney is on 454 to Santorum's 217. Newt Gingrich, former House Speaker, with 107 delegates is coming under pressure from the Santorum people to exit the race. Certainly, he needs big wins in the Southern State primaries on Tuesday March 14th. But would that be enough? Should he step aside to give the more Right wing Santorum a fair crack at Romney?
For one of the best GOP Delegate Trackers around visit http://projects.wsj.com/campaign2012/delegates
One thing is for sure - the way this Republican primary has panned out is putting pressure on GOP public and private resources to fight the general election - in two key ways.
1. The obvious one is money - this is a very expensive primary campaign. An example - Romney last week began making his first public appeals for money even though his personal wealth is estimated at $250 million.
2. More significantly, will this campaign cause irreversible fractures along the left/right GOP fault-lines? And is that maybe what this year is really about for the GOP? Are they giving up on the White House in order to get their own house in order first?
So a second "Super Tuesday" beckons......
More to follow....
Sunday, 4 March 2012
FEMEN - Political protest with a difference
The scale of upheaval worldwide over the last number of years is defining a new worldview for all of us. The scale of the economic collapses, the Arab spring which continues over a year later with blood on Syrian streets.
So how (refreshingly? - is that the right word to use?) to have come across FEMEN. Founded by Kiev University students Anna Hutsol and Alexandra Shevchenko in 2008, this is a political protest group with a difference. Two differences actually.
Numbering 300+ this female group protest topless. They are 'topless warriors'. Initially and primarily concerned with domestic Ukrainian and women's issues ( "To develop leadership, intellectual and moral qualities of the young women in Ukraine" and "To build up the image of Ukraine, the country with great opportunities for women") they have since tackled international issues e.g Women's rights in Iran, the Catholic Church, Euro 2012 to name but a few, and inspired similar movments in other countries.
Check out http://femen.org/ for full info and updates.
Here is a taste of what to expect;
Or take a look at this;
Brave women of FEMEN, I salute you! I will post updates on FEMEN as I get them.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)