Irish Referendum on the
EU Fiscal Compact Treaty
May 31st
2012
The
Irish Government has announced that the referendum to amend the
Constitution to allow the State to ratify the EU Fiscal Compact
Treaty (formally,
the Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance in the Economic
and Monetary Union; also called the Fiscal Stability Treaty)
will be held on May 31st.
The
battle-lines were drawn as soon as the Government received the AG's
advice of the necessity to hold a referendum. With the announcement
of the date the campaign will begin in earnest. So, what's it all
about?
In
it's simplest terms this Treaty provides a legislative basis to give
the EU overarching control of the constituent economies of the
eurozone area.
Oh, right. Sorry.
That's EU-bureaucratic speak, for it's gives the EU complete financial control over the economies, and by extension, the budgetary policy of the eurozone member states.
Oh, right. Sorry.
That's EU-bureaucratic speak, for it's gives the EU complete financial control over the economies, and by extension, the budgetary policy of the eurozone member states.
Let's do that again;
it's gives the EU complete
financial control over the economies, and by extension, the budgetary policy
of the eurozone member states
This
will be achieved by the imposition of a national requirement to have
national budgets that are in balance or in surplus. The European
Court of Justice would fine a country up to 0.1% of GDP if this has
not been done this a year after ratification. It will
create
a fiscal union across the eurozone with strict and enforceable fiscal
rules and automatic penalties
where these rules are not kept. The EU, or more specifically, Germany
and France will be calling the shots on the fiscal policies of the EU
member states. Countries dancing to this tune will then, and only
then, be allowed access funding from the ESM (European Stability
Mechanism), a permanent rescue fund to be established in tandem with
the ratification of this Treaty. In other words, do with the Germans
say and they will (continue to) give you bailout money. Otherwise,
it's even more hardship and suffering as your hung out to dry.
In
short – it's a classic hobson's choice (with a twist – see
below). Austerity or more Austerity?
So,
in the specific case of the Irish Republic, why do I advocate a 'NO'
vote? The reasons are many and complex. It would be disingenuous of
me to reel of the bog standard pisspoor arguments of the anti-Europe faction in Ireland. There is a always a vote 'NO' brigade on the far
left of the political spectrum who I really believe only oppose
referenda because the government of the day supports and proposes the
amendment. The old chestnuts like neutrality and abortion cannot be trotted out either. This is purely financial.
Here are the main reasons I advocate a 'NO' vote;
Here are the main reasons I advocate a 'NO' vote;
- On the grounds that this is a treaty that will entrench, indeed, embed within an EU legislative framework the austerity measures being endured by Irish people. VOTE 'NO'
- On the grounds that the process of stripping Ireland of her economic sovereignty, begun by the EU/ECB/IMF in November 2010 would be completed. Our economic independence would be lost to Brussels, or more accurately, Germany. VOTE 'NO'
- On the basis of (1) and (2) above, it is clear that this is an austerity treaty. VOTE 'NO'
- Ireland is being forced by the pre-existing bailout deal to pay bondholder debts for banks the state itself now owns. Despite election pledges to the contrary. VOTE 'NO'
- Any remote possibility Ireland has of renegotiating the terms of the 2010 bailout deal would be gone for good. Actually, they would be reinforced. We would be unable to restructure our own debts. VOTE 'NO'
- On the basis of (4) and (5) above, Ireland would be locked into a depressive economic cycle that could take generations to break out of. VOTE 'NO'
- Because our inequitable flat rate household charge is EU/ECB/IMF imposed. VOTE 'NO'
- Because of all the other sneaky charges Edna & Co have in store (septic tanks, water rates etc.) VOTE 'NO'
- Because of everything we have learned from the Mahon Tribunal report about our corrupt and rotten political system and politicians. From all parties. Because I am sick of them robbing us blind and laughing at us. VOTE 'NO'
Now here's the real rub, as far as this Treaty and the direction Europe is taking. I describe it as the EU democratic deficit. Because in order to ensure the big players get their way in Europe, through this Treaty, in response to the sovereign debt crisis and to ensure that no one country (especially a small irrelevant like Ireland) can no longer hold up the European project, a la Lisbon, they have rewritten the rules so that our vote, our referenda don't matter anymore.
Let me explain;
Let me explain;
The
powers that be in the EU (Germany and France that is) have been
stumbling around in the dark in response to the EU sovereign debt
crisis. Their answer is wrapped up in this Fiscal Compact treaty. And
it is EU Fiscal harmonisation. Controlled by Germany of course. This
was what they initially wanted to achieve with the proposed EU
Constitution. That was dropped like a piece of hot coal when Spain
rejected and it looked likely the French people
would do the same. The lack of centralised economic control was what
undermined the EURO right from the outset. Sure, the Germans had
nominal control at that point and as long as the economic outlook
(artificially fuelled during the 'boom' years and underpinned by a
strong German economy) stayed good things were OK – but the
sovereign debt crisis exploded that myth. Having invested so much in
the EURO and the European project the EU couldn't afford to let the
EURO collapse.
Now,
it was OK, to force (frighten, coerce, threaten, take your pick)
Ireland into second referendums on Nice & Lisbon. But that would
not be done in Spain or France (EU Constitution). And what if some
pesky country like Ireland voted down their precious Fiscal Compact?
(In any event only Ireland of 27 eurozone members is bound to hold a
referendum, the UK has not endorsed the Treaty and will remain
outside) Or if Greece fell apart before it came into effect? (Quick,
throw some bailout money their way).
The
answer was simple. With the stroke of a pen 60 years of the European
project was jettisoned. Only 12 countries need ratify the treaty by
January 1st
2013 for it to come into effect. (That's Germany, France, Spain,
Holland, Belgium, Luxembourg, Italy, Denmark, Sweden, Portugal, Malta
& Finland maybe??) The rest can sink or swim. Once the treaty is
in effect, you will be cut off quick if you don't play ball (that is
surrender to fiscal federalism). Being inside is no guarantee of not
being cut adrift or being forced out of the EURO. This
is the new EU sponsored democratic
deficit.
It smacks of arrogance and smugness and a complete disregard for a
small nation like ours. So, now I am wondering - is Ireland better off without the EU?
A
'NO' vote from Ireland won't stop this. The EU gerrymandering has
ensured this. But let them have it. Ireland, along with our largest
trading partner, the UK, (a good enough reason on its own) is better of out of
this. Then we would have the opportunity (if not the politicians, but
hey, lets do one thing at a time) to map our own way forward out of
this economic mire. Iceland and Argentina are good reference points
for us here.
There
is an alternative. Vote
'NO'.
No comments:
Post a Comment